<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Triple Venti &#187; NCLB</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tripleventi.com/category/nclb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tripleventi.com</link>
	<description>Extra Large, Extra Strong... without being bitter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 02:34:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>More on Education &#8220;Technology&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://tripleventi.com/2007/04/10/more-on-education-technology/</link>
		<comments>http://tripleventi.com/2007/04/10/more-on-education-technology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 13:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JayMonster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NCLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rantings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tripleventi.com/2007/04/10/more-on-education-technology/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I struggled a bit (FINE, more than just a little) when I tried to address the results of the study done by the Department of Education on using Technology (specifically &#8220;software&#8221;) for education. However, in BusinessWeek this week, U.S. Representative Ron Kind (D-WI), does an excellent job of juggling the issues with the results, and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tripleventi.com/2007/04/10/more-on-education-technology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another silver bullet nothing but lead?</title>
		<link>http://tripleventi.com/2007/04/05/another-silver-bullet-nothing-but-lead/</link>
		<comments>http://tripleventi.com/2007/04/05/another-silver-bullet-nothing-but-lead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 21:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JayMonster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NCLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Parenting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tripleventi.com/2007/04/05/another-silver-bullet-nothing-but-lead/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was supposed to be a panacea for students, their parents and teachers alike. Software that was supposed to improve students scores, and make the pipe-dream 100% student proficiency goals of No Child Left Behind a possibility. However, the study that was mandated by Congress back in 2002 on the heels of NCLB, puts the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tripleventi.com/2007/04/05/another-silver-bullet-nothing-but-lead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NCLB: Unattainable Goals</title>
		<link>http://tripleventi.com/2007/03/16/nclb-unattainable-goals/</link>
		<comments>http://tripleventi.com/2007/03/16/nclb-unattainable-goals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JayMonster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NCLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Parenting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tripleventi.com/2007/03/16/nclb-unattainable-goals/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems that there are at least some that are coming to the realization that the goals as they were set forth in the original No Child Left Behind Act, are completely unattainable and unrealistic. Washington Post (via MSNBC so you don&#8217;t need to register) &#8220;There is a zero percent chance that we will ever [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tripleventi.com/2007/03/16/nclb-unattainable-goals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pay to keep your child home sick</title>
		<link>http://tripleventi.com/2007/03/13/pay-to-keep-your-child-home-sick/</link>
		<comments>http://tripleventi.com/2007/03/13/pay-to-keep-your-child-home-sick/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 19:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JayMonster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NCLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Parenting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tripleventi.com/2007/03/13/pay-to-keep-your-child-home-sick/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It sounds stupid. And it is. They use the excuse that they are &#8220;getting tough&#8221; on parents that decide to take their children on vacation during the school year. But the fact of the matter is that California schools will start billing families $36 a day when their child is absent. And you can bet [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tripleventi.com/2007/03/13/pay-to-keep-your-child-home-sick/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

