<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Data, same excuses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tripleventi.com/2008/03/12/new-data-same-excuses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tripleventi.com/2008/03/12/new-data-same-excuses/</link>
	<description>Extra Large, Extra Strong... without being bitter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 14:24:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jasi</title>
		<link>http://tripleventi.com/2008/03/12/new-data-same-excuses/comment-page-1/#comment-7377</link>
		<dc:creator>Jasi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 13:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tripleventi.com/2008/03/12/new-data-same-excuses/#comment-7377</guid>
		<description>Awesome that it&#039;s available.  I&#039;m just a little cautious as it&#039;s so new and there haven&#039;t been any long-term studies on it yet.  I&#039;m feeling fortunate that my daughter is only 2 now so I have some time to watch the effects before I commit.  But I still think it&#039;s a good idea.

Here&#039;s what&#039;s got me scratching my head though... Why isn&#039;t it offered to boys?  If it&#039;s &quot;transmitted&quot; during sex, wouldn&#039;t they be the umm.. transmitters?  If they can care enough about a girl to sleep with her, shouldn&#039;t they care enough to protect her from an array of horrible diseases?  Imagine being a boy in love and finding out you&#039;d just given her HPV (with cancer a possible eventuality)!!?  Horrible!!!

If it&#039;s safe and available, both of my children would receive this vaccine, boy and girl.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome that it&#8217;s available.  I&#8217;m just a little cautious as it&#8217;s so new and there haven&#8217;t been any long-term studies on it yet.  I&#8217;m feeling fortunate that my daughter is only 2 now so I have some time to watch the effects before I commit.  But I still think it&#8217;s a good idea.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what&#8217;s got me scratching my head though&#8230; Why isn&#8217;t it offered to boys?  If it&#8217;s &#8220;transmitted&#8221; during sex, wouldn&#8217;t they be the umm.. transmitters?  If they can care enough about a girl to sleep with her, shouldn&#8217;t they care enough to protect her from an array of horrible diseases?  Imagine being a boy in love and finding out you&#8217;d just given her HPV (with cancer a possible eventuality)!!?  Horrible!!!</p>
<p>If it&#8217;s safe and available, both of my children would receive this vaccine, boy and girl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharpie</title>
		<link>http://tripleventi.com/2008/03/12/new-data-same-excuses/comment-page-1/#comment-6731</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharpie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tripleventi.com/2008/03/12/new-data-same-excuses/#comment-6731</guid>
		<description>Perhaps if these women watched their friend die slowly, painfully and horribly - ripped away forever from her 2-year daughter who would never even remember her - they might think the shot was a good idea. I had the displeasure of doing just that four years ago. My friend&#039;s cervical cancer took her from her family and friends and to think there is a chance of preventing the disease from taking even one more girl far outweighs anything that may or may happen down the road.

I wish that not one person has to watch someone die from cervical cancer - because it ain&#039;t pretty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps if these women watched their friend die slowly, painfully and horribly &#8211; ripped away forever from her 2-year daughter who would never even remember her &#8211; they might think the shot was a good idea. I had the displeasure of doing just that four years ago. My friend&#8217;s cervical cancer took her from her family and friends and to think there is a chance of preventing the disease from taking even one more girl far outweighs anything that may or may happen down the road.</p>
<p>I wish that not one person has to watch someone die from cervical cancer &#8211; because it ain&#8217;t pretty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris</title>
		<link>http://tripleventi.com/2008/03/12/new-data-same-excuses/comment-page-1/#comment-6705</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 22:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tripleventi.com/2008/03/12/new-data-same-excuses/#comment-6705</guid>
		<description>Personally my daughter doesn&#039;t need to know WHY she&#039;s getting the vaccine, other than the fact that it&#039;s to help keep her from getting a bad disease - the same reason we vaccinate against smallpox and measles, mumps, and rubella.  

She&#039;s old enough to read about it on her own, of course.  And she likely will.  But she also knows what cancer is and how it can kill.  Her &quot;Aunt Cindy&quot; had to have a hysterectomy due to cervical and uterine cancer, and now she also has leukemia, so I&#039;m sure she&#039;s not going to question it.

And yes, we do hope they save themselves for marriage, but who&#039;s to say there isn&#039;t another method of transmission found years or even months from now?  (Things change - and they find new ways that all kinds of diseases were transmitted as time goes on.  KWIM?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally my daughter doesn&#8217;t need to know WHY she&#8217;s getting the vaccine, other than the fact that it&#8217;s to help keep her from getting a bad disease &#8211; the same reason we vaccinate against smallpox and measles, mumps, and rubella.  </p>
<p>She&#8217;s old enough to read about it on her own, of course.  And she likely will.  But she also knows what cancer is and how it can kill.  Her &#8220;Aunt Cindy&#8221; had to have a hysterectomy due to cervical and uterine cancer, and now she also has leukemia, so I&#8217;m sure she&#8217;s not going to question it.</p>
<p>And yes, we do hope they save themselves for marriage, but who&#8217;s to say there isn&#8217;t another method of transmission found years or even months from now?  (Things change &#8211; and they find new ways that all kinds of diseases were transmitted as time goes on.  KWIM?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
